Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2014, 158(2):259-264 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2013.059

Iterative reconstruction of pulmonary MDCT angiography: Effects on image quality, effective dose and estimated organ dose to the breast

Jan Zizkaa, Pavel Ryskaa, Jana Stepanovskaa, Zuzana Poulovaa, Ludovit Klzoa, Jakub Grepla, Eva Cermakovab
a Department of Radiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
b Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University in Prague, Hradec Kralove

Aims: To compare the image characteristics, effective dose and estimated organ dose to the female breast in pulmonary MDCT angiography (MDCTA), reconstructed with either standard filtered back projection (FBP), or iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS).

Methods: Pulmonary MDCTA performed in 116 females (age 18 - 77 years; body mass index 15 - 48) was reconstructed with FBP (n=52) or IRIS (n=64). Scans were acquired on a 128-row MDCT system using automatic tube current modulation, 100 kV tube voltage, and a quality reference mAs value of 120 (FBP) and 80 (IRIS). Dose was calculated from CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) values utilising ImPACT software. Image noise was measured within the pulmonary artery. Qualitative visual assessment of the scans was performed (1=negligible noise, 5=noise obscuring diagnostic information).

Results: The average CTDIvol yielded 4.33 mGy for FBP and 3.54 mGy for IRIS, respectively (18.2% decrease). The average effective scan dose was 2.73±0.57 mSv (FBP) and 2.29±0.68 mSv (IRIS), respectively (16.1% decrease). The estimated average organ dose to the breast decreased from 5.1±1.1 mGy (FBP) to 4.2±1.2 mGy (IRIS, 17.6% decrease). No non-diagnostic scans (score 5) were encountered in either group. Significant improvement in image noise levels (P<0.01) and subjective image quality (P<0.02) were noted in IRIS group.

Conclusion: Pulmonary MDCTA utilizing a 100 kV technique, automatic tube current modulation, and iterative image reconstruction offers robust results in routine conditions among an unselected female population, with breast doses being comparable to two-view digital mammography. Moreover, iterative reconstruction offers improvements in both image noise and visual perception of the scans, thus suggesting a potential for further dose reduction.

Keywords: multidetector computed tomography, pulmonary embolism, image reconstruction, iterative reconstruction, radiation effects, breast dose, effective dose

Received: May 26, 2013; Accepted: July 25, 2013; Prepublished online: September 12, 2013; Published: June 23, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zizka, J., Ryska, P., Stepanovska, J., Poulova, Z., Klzo, L., Grepl, J., & Cermakova, E. (2014). Iterative reconstruction of pulmonary MDCT angiography: Effects on image quality, effective dose and estimated organ dose to the breast. Biomedical papers, 158(2), 259-264. doi: 10.5507/bp.2013.059
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS, Lipoti JA, Mahesh M, McCrohan JL, Stabin MG, Thomadsen BR, Yoshizumi TT. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources 1950-2007. Radiology 2009;253:520-31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, Saini S. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004;230:619-28. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Mancini GB, Lin FY, Taylor C, Dunning A, Earls JP. Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:655-60. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T, Faivre JB, Duhamel A, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M. Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 2011;21:636-43. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, Berrington de González A, Miglioretti DL. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2078-86. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Johnson PT, Naidich D, Fishman EK. MDCT for suspected pulmonary embolism: multi-institutional survey of 16-MDCT data acquisition protocols. Emerg Radiol 2007;13(5):243-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Pontana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J, Flohr T, Faivre JB, Hachulla AL, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M. Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol 2011;21(3):636-43. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR, Hsieh J, Pien H, Singh S, Gilman MD, Shepard JA. Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34(1):40-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Parker MS, Kelleher NM, Hoots JA, Chung JK, Fatouros PP, Benedict SH. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results. Clin Radiol 2008;63(3):278-88. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Vollmar SV, Kalender WA. Reduction of dose to the female breast in thoracic CT: a comparison of standard-protocol, bismuth-shielded, partial and tube-current-modulated CT examinations. Eur Radiol 2008;18(8):1674-82. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Wang J, Duan X, Christner JA, Leng S, Yu L, McCollough CH. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current. Med Phys 2011;38(11):6084-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Björkdahl P, Nyman U. Using 100- instead of 120-kVp computed tomography to diagnose pulmonary embolism almost halves the radiation dose with preserved diagnostic quality. Acta Radiol 2010;51(3):260-70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Sigal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, Chen X, Paul JF. Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology 2004;231(1):169-74. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Schueller-Weidekamm C, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Weber M, Herold CJ, Prokop M. CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings. Radiology 2006;241(3):899-907. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA, Chung JK, Broga DW, Sethi NN. Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185(5):1228-33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. De Zordo T, von Lutterotti K, Dejaco C, Soegner PF, Frank R, Aigner F, Klauser AS, Pechlaner C, Schoepf UJ, Jaschke WR, Feuchtner GM. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of different pulmonary CTA protocols on a 128-slice CT: high-pitch dual source CT, dual energy CT and conventional spiral CT. Eur Radiol 2012;22(2):279-86. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Yilmaz MH, Albayram S, Yaºar D, Ozer H, Adaletli I, Selçuk D, Akman C, Altuğ A. Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31(1):138-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, Nelson RC, Toncheva G, Nguyen GB, Lowry C, Anderson-Evans C. Radiation dose savings for adult pulmonary embolus 64-MDCT using bismuth breast shields, lower peak kilovoltage, and automatic tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(1):244-53. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AAPM Position Statement on the Use of Bismuth Shielding for the Purpose of Dose Reduction in CT scanning. Published February 7, 2012. Available at: http://www.aapm.org/publicgeneral/BismuthShielding.pdf
    20. Hurwitz LM, Reiman RE, Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, Toncheva G, Nguyen G, Lowry C. Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: implications for cancer induction. Radiology 2007;245(3):742-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Litmanovich D, Tack D, Lin PJ, Boiselle PM, Raptopoulos V, Bankier AA. Female breast, lung, and pelvic organ radiation from dose-reduced 64-MDCT thoracic examination protocols: a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197(4):929-34. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Hendrick RE. Radiation Doses and Cancer Risks from Breast Imaging Studies. Radiology 2010;257(1):246-53. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Kuiper JW, Geleijns J, Matheijssen NA, Teeuwisse W, Pattynama PM. Radiation exposure of multi-row detector spiral computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries: comparison with digital subtraction pulmonary angiography. Eur Radiol 2003;13(7):1496-1500. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    24. Woo JK, Chiu RY, Thakur Y, Mayo JR. Risk-benefit analysis of pulmonary CT angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198(6):1332-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    Return to the content