Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2013, 157(2):181-188 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2011.059

A significant proportion of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and suboptimal response according to European Leukemia Net criteria have excellent prognosis without treatment change

Peter Rohona, Edgar Fabera, Martina Divokaa, Sarka Rozmanovaa, David Friedeckyb, Marie Jarosovaa, Karel Indraka
a Department of Hemato-Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic
b Laboratory of Inherited Metabolic Disorders, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc

Background: The Recommendations of the European Leukemia Net (ELN) have become an essential tool in the management and prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the definition of suboptimal response remains under discussion.

Methods: We used conventional cytogenetics for the detection of clonal changes in Ph-positive and negative clones. RT-PCR and sequencing were carried out on peripheral blood leukocytes to detect the type of BCR-ABL1 transcript. The BCR-ABL1 mutational status was assessed using sequencing of RT-PCR products. High performance capillary electrophoresis for determination of imatinib (IMA) plasma concentration was used.

Results: A retrospective study of 110 patients diagnosed with chronic-phase (CP) CML treated with IMA or 2nd generation TKIs in the years 2000-2009 focused on analysis of patients with suboptimal response according to ELN criteria. 40 patients were administered IMA as first-line therapy and 70 had been pretreated with interferon-alpha (IFN-α) with or without Ara-C and/or hydroxyurea (HU) for a median 12 months (range, 1-92 months). After adjusting for the ELN criteria, major molecular response (MMR) was achieved after median 34 and 39 months in 66.7% and 41.7% of patients after the first and second-line IMA therapy with suboptimal response defined as lack of achievement of MMR at the 18th month of treatment, respectively. In comparison to patients with optimal response, patients with suboptimal response did not show significant differences in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). Cytogenetic assays demonstrated additional chromosome abnormalities (ACAs): chromosome 8 trisomy in a Ph-negative clone during the IMA treatment (in 1 case) and der(9q) in Ph-positive clone (in 2 cases); in patients receiving first-line IMA only chromosome 8 trisomy was observed which was associated with myelodysplastic syndrome - this was the only case where hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was performed. During the treatment with IMA in both subgroups no regulatory mutations in the ABL kinase domain were confirmed.

Conclusion: We believe that the category of suboptimal response should be redefined or withdrawn from the ELN 2009 recommendations for management of CML patients treated with TKIs. Patients with suboptimal response who have no additional risks (additional cytogenetic abnormalities or BCR-ABL1 regulatory mutations) may remain on IMA treatment while patients with these risks should be switched to the 2nd generation TKIs.

Keywords: chronic myeloid leukemia, ELN recommendations, suboptimal response

Received: August 11, 2011; Accepted: October 24, 2011; Prepublished online: November 30, 2011; Published: June 21, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Rohon, P., Faber, E., Divoka, M., Rozmanova, S., Friedecky, D., Jarosova, M., & Indrak, K. (2013). A significant proportion of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and suboptimal response according to European Leukemia Net criteria have excellent prognosis without treatment change. Biomedical papers157(2), 181-188. doi: 10.5507/bp.2011.059
Download citation

References

  1. Baccarani M, Saglio G, Goldman J, Hochhaus A, Simonsson B, Appelbaum F, Apperley J, Cervantes F, Cortes J, Deininger M, Gratwohl A, Guilhot F, Horowitz M, Hughes T, Kantarjian H, Larson R, Niederwieser D, Silver R, Hehlmann R. Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood 2006;108:1809-20. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Baccarani M, Cortes J, Pane F, Niederwieser D, Saglio G, Apperley J, Cervantes F, Deininger M, Gratwohl A, Guilhot F, Hochhaus A, Horowitz M, Hughes T, Kantarjian H, Larson R, Radich J, Simonsson B, Silver RT, Goldman J, Hehlmann R. Chronic myeloid leukemia: an update of concepts and management recommendations of European Leukemia Net. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Marin D, Milojkovic D, Olavarria E, Khorashad JS, de Lavallade H, Reid AG, Foroni L, Rezvani K, Bua M, Dazzi F, Pavlu J, Klammer M, Kaeda1 JS, Goldman J, Apperley J. European LeukemiaNet criteria for failure or suboptimal response reliably identify patients with CML in early chronic phase treated with imatinib whose eventual outcome is poor. Blood 2008;112:4437-44. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Faber E, Nausova J, Jarosova M, Egorin MJ, Holzerova M, Rozmanova S, Maresova I, Divoky V, Indrak K. Intermittent dosage of imatinib mesylate in CML patients with history of significant hematologic toxicity after standard dosing. Leuk Lymphoma 2006,47:1082-90. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. de Lavallade H, Apperley J, Khorashad JS, Milojkovic D, Reid AG, Bua M, Szydlo R, Olavarria E, Kaeda J, Goldman JM, Marin D. Imatinib for newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: incidence of sustained responses in an intention-to-treat analysis. JCO 2008;20:3358-63. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: chronic myelogenous leukemia,V.1.2009, www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/ cml.pdf
  7. Hochhaus A, Dreyling M. Chronic myelogenous leukemia: ESMO clinical recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2008;19:63-4. Go to original source...
  8. Australasian Leukemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG). Myeloproliferative Disease Subcommittee. Australasian treatment guidelines for de novo CML CP, v1.0. Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand 2006.
  9. Laneuville P, Barnett MJ, Belanger R, Couban S, Forrest DL, Roy DC, Lipton JH. Recommendations of the Canadian Consensus Group on the Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Curr. Oncol. 2006;13:201-21. Go to original source...
  10. Deininger M, O'Brien SG, Guilhot F, Goldman JM, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, Radich JP, Hatfield AK, Mone M, Filian J, Reynolds J, Gathmann I, Larson RA, Druker BJ. International randomized study of interferon vs STI571 (IRIS) 8-year follow up: sustained survival and low risk for progression or events in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with imatinib. Blood 2009;114:482, Abstract 1126. Go to original source...
  11. Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O'Brien SG, Gathmann I, Kantarjian H, Gattermann N, Deininger MWN, Silver RT, Goldman JM, Stone RM, Cervantes F, Hochhaus A, Powell BL, Gabrilove JL, Rousselot P, Reiffers J, Cornelissen JJ, Hughes T, Agis H, Fischer T, Verhoef G, Shepherd J, Saglio G, Gratwohl A, Nielsen JL, Radich JP, Simonsson B, Taylor K, Baccarani M, So C, Letvak, L, Larson RA. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2408-17. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Hughes TP, Kaeda J, Branford S, Rudzki Z, Hochhaus A, Hensley ML, Gathmann I, Bolton AE, van Hoomissen IC, Goldman JM, Radich JP. Frequency of major molecular responses to imatinib or interferon alfa plus cytarabine in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1423-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Tipping AJ, Mahon FX, Lagarde V, Goldman JM, Melo JV. Restoration of sensitivity to STI571 in STI571- resistant chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Blood 2001;98:3864-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Branford S, Rudzki Z, Walsh S, Parkinson I, Grigg A, Szer J, Taylor K, Herrmann R, Seymour JF, Arthur C, Joske D, Lynch K, Hughes T. Detection of BCR/ABL mutations in patients with CML treated with imatinib is virtually allways accompanied by clinical resistance, and mutation in the ATP-phosphate binding loop (P-loop) are associated with a poor prognosis. Blood 2003;102:276-83. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Tauchi T, Ohyashiki K. Molecular mechanism of resistance of leukemia to imatinib mesylate. Leuk Research 2004;28:39-45. Go to original source...
  16. Donato NJ, Wu JY, Stapley J, Gallick G, Lin H, Arlinghaus R, Talpaz M. BCR-ABL independence and LYN kinase overexpression in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells selected for resistance to STI571. Blood 2003;101:690-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Hamada A, Miyano H, Watanabe H, Saito H. Interaction of imatinibe mesylate with human P-glycoprotein. Journal Pharmacol Exp Ther 2003;307:824-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Widmer N, Colombo S, Buclin T, Decosterd LA. Functional consequuence of MDR1 expression on imatinib intracellular concetrations. Blood 2003;102:1142. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Thomas J, Wang L, Clark RE, Pirmohamed M. Active transport of imatinib into and out of cells: implications for drug resistance. Blood 2004;104:3739-45. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Burger H, Nooter K. Pharmacokinetic resistance to imatinib mesylate: role of the ABC drug pumps ABCG2 (BCRP) and ABCB1 (MDR1) in the oral bioavailability of imatinib. Cell Cycle 2004;3:1502-05. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Terre C, Eclache V, Rousselot P, Imbert M, Charrin C, Gervais C, Mozziconacci MJ, Maarek O, Mossafa H, Auger N, Dastugue N, Talmant P, Van den Akker J, Leonard C, N'Guyen Khac F, Mugneret F, Viguie F, Lafage-Pochitaloff M, Bastie JN, Roux GL, Nicolini F, Maloisel F, Vey N, Laurent G, Recher C, Vigier M, Yacouben Y, Giraudier S, Vernant JP, Salles B, Roussi J, Castaigne S, Leymarie V, Flandrin G, Lessard M. Report of 34 patients with clonal chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia-negative cells during imatinib treatment of Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2004;18:1340-46. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Holzerova M, Faber E, Veselovska J, Urbankova H, Balcarkova J, Rozmanova S, Voglova J, Muzik J, Chroust K, Indrak K, Jarosova M. Imatinib mesylate efficacy in 72 previously treated Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients with and without additional chromosomal changes: single centre results. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 2009;191:1-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Mustjoki S,  Lundan T, Knuutila S,  Porkka K. Appearance of bone marrow lymphocytosis predicts an optimal response to imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2007;21:2363-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Gambacorti-Passerini C, Barni R, Le CP, Zucchetti M, Cabrita G, Cleris L, Rossi F, Gianazza E, Brueggen J, Cozens R, Pioltelli P, Pogliani E, Corneo G, Formelli F, D'Incalci M. Role of alpha1 acid glycoprotein in the in vivo resistence of human BCR-ABL(+) leukemic cells to the ABL inhibitor STI571. J Natl Cancor Inst 2000;92:1641-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Garcia-Gutierrez V, Herrera P, Jimenez-Rolando P, Tenorio M, Calbacho M, Velasco D, Alonso JM, Ramos L, Ramos P, Rey MD, Lopez-Jimenez J.Outcomes of chronic myeloid leukemia patients with suboptimal response to imatinib. EHA 2011, poster No. 0696.
  26. Porkka K, Mustjoki S, Simonsson B. Suboptimal responses in chronic myeloid leukemia: milestones and mechanisms. Expert Rev Hematol. 2009;1:81-91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...