Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2012, 156(2):164-170 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2011.058

Comparison of the quality of lower limb magnetic resonance angiographies performed with different paramagnetic contrast agents in relation to body mass index and ejection fraction

Lukas Hrdinaa, Martin Kochera, Miroslav Hermana, Marie Cernaa, Jiri Kozaka, Zbynek Tudosa, Shankari Mahathmakanthia, Katerina Langovab,c
a Department of Radiology, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic
b Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc
c Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc

Aim: To compare the quality of magnetic resonance angiographies (MRAs) performed with different contrast agents and to evaluate the effect of body mass index (BMI) and ejection fraction (EF) on the quality of these MRAs.

Materials and Methods: 120 patients between the age of 43 and 86 years were subjected to MRAs with different contrast agents (Gadobutrolum, Dimeglumini gadobenas, Gadofosveset trisodium). Each patient's BMI was calculated, and EF was established using MR examination of the heart. Objective evaluations of the quality of the MRAs were done using abdominal fat-to-aorta enhancement ratio (FAR) comparisons. This ratio was then correlated with the patient's BMI and EF. Subjective evaluations of the quality of the MRAs were done by 5 blinded evaluators. Correlation analysis and analysis of variance were used for statistical assessement.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in FAR for any of the contrast agent groups. There was a mesoscale correlation between a patient's BMI and FAR. However, no correlation was found between the EF and FAR for any of the contrast agent groups. The results of the subjective evaluation showed that there was no statistical difference in the quality of MRAs regardless of the contrast agent used.

Conclusion: Subjectively there was no statistically significant difference in the quality of the MRAs. Irrespective of the type of contrast used or the patient's EF, the lower the BMI of a patient the higher the signal enhancement and hence the better the quality of the MRA produced in that patient.

Keywords: ischemic disease of lower leg arteries, MR angiography, paramagnetic contrast agent

Received: June 14, 2011; Accepted: October 24, 2011; Prepublished online: November 30, 2011; Published: June 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hrdina, L., Kocher, M., Herman, M., Cerna, M., Kozak, J., Tudos, Z., Mahathmakanthi, S., & Langova, K. (2012). Comparison of the quality of lower limb magnetic resonance angiographies performed with different paramagnetic contrast agents in relation to body mass index and ejection fraction. Biomedical papers156(2), 164-170. doi: 10.5507/bp.2011.058
Download citation

References

  1. Kuijk van JP, Flu WJ, Bax JJ, Poldermans D. Prevalence of (a) symptomatic peripheral arterial disease; the additional value of ankle-brachial index on cardiovascular risk stratification. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;38(3):305-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Eliáš P, Žižka J. Dopplerovská ultrasonografie. 1st ed. Hradec Králové: Nucleus; 1998.p.108-130.
  3. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria: claudication- suspected vascular etiology. Available from: http:// www.acr.org/SecondaryMain-MenuCategories/quality_safety/ app_criteria/pdf/Vascular/ClaudicationDoc9.aspx.
  4. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Murphy WR, Olin JW, Puschett JB, Rosenfield KA, Sacks D, Stanley JC, Taylor LM Jr, White CJ, White J, White RA, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation 2006;113(11):463-654. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Meaney JFM, Goyen M. Recent advances in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol Suppl 2007;17(Suppl 2):B2-B6. Go to PubMed...
  6. Prince MR, Grist TM, Debatin JF. 3D contrast MR angiography. Berlin: Springer; 2003.
  7. Hrdina L, Kocher M, Herman M, Horak D, Cerna M, Kozak J, Bucil J, Langova K. Porovnani kvality MRA abdominalni aorty a tepen dolnich koncetin pri pouziti ruznych paramagnetickych kontrastnich latek. Ces Radiol 2010;64(1):28-33.
  8. Cotton F, Hermier M. The advantage of high relaxivity contrast agents in brain perfusion. Eur Radiol Suppl 2006;16(Suppl 7):M16-M26. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Pintaske J, Martirosian P, Graf H, Erb G, Lodemann KP, Claussen CD, Schick F. Relaxivity of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist), gadobutrol (Gadovist) and gadobenate dimeglumine (Multihance) in human blood plasma at 0,2 T, 1,5 T and 3 T. Invest Radiol 2006;41(12):213-21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...