Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2018, 162(4):329-334 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2018.027

Comparison of the efficiency of femtoLASIK and ReLEx SMILE in terms of dioptric error reduction

Zuzana Pavkova, Jana Kacerovska, Martin Kacerovsky
The Horni Pocernice Eye Clinic, Prague, Czech Republic

Background and Aims: Refractive eye surgery is a rapidly expanding field of ophthalmology and corneal surgery is undergoing constant development leading to less invasive technologies. The goal of this study was to compare the most common femtoLASIK surgery with the newer ReLEx SMILE surgery which is gentler to the cornea. The comparison was made in terms of dioptric error reduction.

Methods: The studied cohort of patients consisted of two major groups: 30 patients who underwent femtoLASIK surgery and 30 who underwent ReLEx SMILE surgery. -30 patients, 60 eyes. All patients were aged 18-45 years with moderate myopia or astigmatism ranging from -3.25 to -6.0 spherical diopters and from 0 to -1.0 cylindrical diopters. In all, the best corrected visual acuity measured prior to surgery was 1.0. Pachymetry was not comparable because each surgical method was performed at a different time point and the introduction of an innovative method into practice led to a change in selection criteria.

Results: During postsurgical check-ups, the ReLEx SMILE method (0.74) led to lower values of non-corrected visual acuity compared to the femtoLASIK method (0.88), (P<0.001). However, the results changed at the one-year post-surgery check-up, when ReLEX SMILE patients achieved non-corrected visual acuity of 0.97 compared to femtoLASIK patients, who scored 0.83, (P=0.007). Based on data analysis from the automatic refractometer, the average spherical diopters of the femtoLASIK (-0.32 D) were higher than those of the ReLEx SMILE (-0.07 D), (P<0.001). The results for the cylindrical diopters were also significant, (P=0.021). When we compared the spherical equivalent one year after surgery, the difference between methods was significant. The FemtoLASIK method resulted in an average SE -0.55 D compared to -0.09 D for the ReLEx SMILE method, (P<0.001).

Conclusion: This study showed that there was a significant difference in results between the two surgical methods of treatment of moderate myopia and astigmatism, in terms of regression of dioptric error, as well as in achievement and maintenance of visual acuity during the observed period. The ReLEx SMILE had better results.

Keywords: femtoLASIK, ReLEx SMILE, corneal stroma, flap, regression

Received: December 17, 2017; Accepted: May 11, 2018; Prepublished online: June 7, 2018; Published: November 14, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pavkova, Z., Kacerovska, J., & Kacerovsky, M. (2018). Comparison of the efficiency of femtoLASIK and ReLEx SMILE in terms of dioptric error reduction. Biomedical papers162(4), 329-334. doi: 10.5507/bp.2018.027
Download citation

References

  1. Hersh PS, Fry KL, Bishop DS. Incidence and associations of retreatment after LASIK. Ophthalmology 2003;110(4):748-54. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Nordan LT, Reoperation after LASIK and PRK. CRST 2003 17
  3. Lohmann CP, Güell JL. Regression after LASIK for the treatment of myopia: the role of the corneal epithelium. Semin Ophthalmol 1998;13(2):79-82. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Mohan RR, Hutcheon AE, Choi R, Hong J, Lee J, Mohan RR, Ambrósio R Jr, Zieske JD, Wilson SE. Apoptosis, necrosis, proliferation, and myofibroblast generation in the stroma following LASIK and PRK. Exp Eye Res 2003;76(1):71-87. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Gauthier CA, Holden BA, Epstein D, Tengroth B, Fagerholm P, Hamberg-Nyström H. Factors affecting epithelial hyperplasia after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23(7):1042-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Chayet AS, Assil KK, Montes M, Espinosa-Lagana M, Castellanos A, Tsioulias G. Regression and its mechanisms after laser in situ keratomileusis in moderate and high myopia. Ophthalmology 1998;105(7):1194-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Dalton M, Pregnancy and refractive surgery. ASCRS Eye world 2012.
  8. Sharif K. Regression of myopia induced by pregnancy after photorefractive keratectomy.J Refract Surg 1997;13(5 Suppl):S445-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Weinreb RN, Lu A, Beeson C. Maternal corneal thickness during pregnancy. Am J Ophthalmol 1988 15;105(3):258-60. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Endl MJ, Martinez CE, Klyce SD, McDonald MB, Coorpender SJ, Applegate RA, Howland HC. Effect of larger ablation zone and transition zone on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(8):1159-64. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Buratto L, Slade S, Tavolato M, LASIK The evolution of refractive surgery, Thorofare 2012: 7-40,105-133
  12. Kuchynka P a kol, Oční lékařství,Praha Grada, 2007:71-209
  13. Feder R, Rapuano Ch, The LASIK handbook- a case-based approach, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams&Wilkins, 2007:3-78
  14. Garg A, Alio J, Surgical techniques in ophthalmology-Corneal surgery, New Delhi,Jaypee-highlights medical publishers, 2010:323-333 Go to original source...
  15. Sekundo W, Gertnere J, Bertelmann T, Solomatin I. One-year refractive results, contrast sensitivity, high-order aberrations and complications after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014;252(5):837-43. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2608-4 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Ursea R, Feng MT. Traumatic flap striae 6 years after LASIK: case report and literature review. J Refract Surg 2010;26(11):899-905. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20091209-02 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Ganesh S, Gupta R. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg 2014;30(9):590-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Li M, Niu L, Qin B, Zhou Z, Ni K, Le Q, Xiang J, Wei A, Ma W, Zhou X. Confocal comparison of corneal reinnervation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). PLoS One 2013 9;8(12):e81435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081435. eCollection 2013 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Mohamed-Noriega K, Riau AK, Lwin NC, Chaurasia SS, Tan DT, Mehta JS. Early corneal nerve damage and recovery following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014 25;55(3):1823-34. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13324 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Tuisku IS, Lindbohm N, Wilson SE, Tervo TM. Dry eye and corneal sensitivity after high myopic LASIK. J Refract Surg 2007;23(4):338-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Vestergaard AH, Grønbech KT, Grauslund J, Ivarsen AR, Hjortdal JØ. Subbasal nerve morphology, corneal sensation, and tear film evaluation after refractive femtosecond laser lenticule extraction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;251(11):2591-600. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2400-x Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Xu Y, Yang Y. Dry eye after small incision lenticule extraction and LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg 2014;30(3):186-90. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140219-02 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Ang M, Tan D, Mehta JS. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial. Trials 2012 31;13:75. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-75 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Vestergaard AH. Past and present of corneal refractive surgery: a retrospective study of long-term results after photorefractive keratectomy and a prospective study of refractive lenticule extraction. Acta Ophthalmol 2014;92 Thesis 2:1-21. doi: 10.1111/aos.12385 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Wang D, Liu M, Chen Y, Zhang X, Xu Y, Wang J, To CH, Liu Q. Differences in the corneal biomechanical changes after SMILE and LASIK. J Refract Surg 2014;30(10):702-7. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140903-09 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Wu D, Wang Y, Zhang L, Wei S, Tang X. Corneal biomechanical effects: small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40(6):954-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.07.056 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Lin F, Xu Y, Yang Y. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg 2014;30(4):248-54. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140320-03 Erratum in: J Refract Surg 2014;30(9):582. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Vestergaard A, Ivarsen A, Asp S, Hjortdal JØ. Femtosecond (FS) laser vision correction procedure for moderate to high myopia: a prospective study of ReLEx(®) flex and comparison with a retrospective study of FS-laser in situ keratomileusis. Acta Ophthalmol 2013;91(4):355-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02406.x Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Wei S, Wang Y. Comparison of corneal sensitivity between FS-LASIK and femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) or small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx smile) for myopic eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;251(6):1645-54. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2272-0 Erratum in: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;251(10):2495-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Dong Z, Zhou X, Wu J, Zhang Z, Li T, Zhou Z, Zhang S, Li G. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK: comparison of corneal wound healing and inflammation. Br J Ophthalmol 2014;98(2):263-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303415. Epub 2013 13 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Ivarsen A, Asp S, Hjortdal J. Safety and complications of more than 1500 small-incision lenticule extraction procedures. Ophthalmology 2014;121(4):822-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 21 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...