Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2023, 167(4):362-365 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2022.041

Thoracoscopic epicardial ablation of atrial fibrillation: Safety, efficacy, single center experience

Martin Troubil, Martin Simek, Jan Juchelka, Andrea Steriovsky, Roman Hajek, Petr Santavy
Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with reduced quality of life and increased risk of ischaemic cerebrovascular events. The left atrial epicardial ablation procedures have evolved towards a successful and safe rhythm control strategy for patients with symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal, persistent or post-ablation AF or with a high risk of catheter ablation failure. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic ablation at our instituiton.

Methods: We observed 81 patients undergoing thoracoscopic ablation from January 2015 to December 2019.

Results: The mean age was 61.3±8.5 years and the average duration of AF was 3.1±2.6 years. The cohort consisted of 16.5% of paroxysmal AF, 36.7% persistent, and 46.8% of long-standing AF. The procedure was completed in 79 patients; during follow-up, 15 patients (19%) received radiofrequency ablation. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence was 55.7% after a follow-up (FUP) period of 3.1±1.4 years. At the follow-up visit, sinus rhythm was present in 81% of patients. No relationships between arrhythmia recurrence and BMI, LVEF, left atrial dimension, gender, and AF duration were found. Major complications were noticed in 4 patients (5.0%); 2 had peripheral embolisation, 2 patients were converted to a sternotomy. At the time of the FUP visit, 25.3% of patients were using antiarrhythmic and 74.7% were still using anticoagulants.

Conclusion: In the majority of patients, sinus rhythm remained despite a considerable atrial tachycardia recurrence rate, with a relatively low percentage of patients on antiarrythmic drugs.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation, thoracoscopic ablation, rhythm

Received: March 13, 2022; Revised: August 25, 2022; Accepted: August 31, 2022; Prepublished online: September 15, 2022; Published: December 4, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Troubil, M., Simek, M., Juchelka, J., Steriovsky, A., Hajek, R., & Santavy, P. (2023). Thoracoscopic epicardial ablation of atrial fibrillation: Safety, efficacy, single center experience. Biomedical papers167(4), 362-365. doi: 10.5507/bp.2022.041
Download citation

References

  1. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: The framingham study. Stroke 1991;22:983-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Lin HJ, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Belanger AJ, D'Agostino RB. Newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation and acute stroke. The framingham study. Stroke 1995;26:1527-30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Boriani G, Castella M, Dan GA, Dilaveris PE, Fauchier L, Filippatos G, Kalman JM, La Meir M, Lane DA, Lebeau JP, Lettino M, Lip GYH, Pinto FJ, Thomas GN, Valgimigli M, Van Gelder IC, Van Putte BP, Watkins CL, Group ESCSD. 2020 esc guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the european association for cardio-thoracic surgery (eacts). Eur Heart J 2021;42:373-498. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Yi S, Liu X, Wang W, Chen L, Yuan H. Thoracoscopic surgical ablation or catheter ablation for patients with atrial fibrillation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2020;31:763-73. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. DeLurgio DB, Crossen KJ, Gill J, Blauth C, Oza SR, Magnano AR, Mostovych MA, Halkos ME, Tschopp DR, Kerendi F, Taigen TL, Shults CC, Shah MH, Rajendra AB, Osorio J, Silver JS, Hook BG, Gilligan DM, Calkins H. Hybrid convergent procedure for the treatment of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: Results of converge clinical trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2020;13:e009288. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Wang TKM, Liao YB, Wang MTM, Martin A. Catheter vs thoracoscopic ablation for atrial fibrillation: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Arrhythm 2020;36:789-93. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Dunnington GH, Pierce CL, Eisenberg S, Bing LL, Chang-Sing P, Kaiser DW, Burk S, Moulton LC, Kiankhooy A. A heart-team hybrid approach for atrial fibrillation: A single-centre long-term clinical outcome cohort study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021;60(6):1343-1350. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab197 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Ariss RW, Khan Minhas AM, Patel NJ, Zafrullah F, Bhavsar K, Nazir S, Jneid H, Moukarbel GV. Contemporary trends and in-hospital outcomes of catheter and stand-alone surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace 2022; 24(2):218-25. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab198 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. van Laar C, Kelder J, van Putte BP. The totally thoracoscopic maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2017;24:102-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Sindby JE, Vadmann H, Lundbye-Christensen S, Riahi S, Hjortshoj S, Boersma LVA, Andreasen JJ. Percutaneous versus thoracoscopic ablation of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A randomised controlled trial - the fast ii study. J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;13:101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Phan K, Phan S, Thiagalingam A, Medi C, Yan TD. Thoracoscopic surgical ablation versus catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;49:1044-51. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. van Laar C, Bentala M, Weimar T, Doll N, Swaans MJ, Molhoek SG, Hofman FN, Kelder J, van Putte BP. Thoracoscopic ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: A systematic outcome analysis of a multicentre cohort. Europace 2019;21:893-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.