Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2023, 167(2):192-198 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2021.068

Median nerve ultrasonography examination correlates with electrodiagnostic studies for the diagnosis of moderate to severe carpal tunnel syndrome

Pavel Potuznik1, Petr Hosek2, Rudolf Kotas1
1 Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, University Hospital Pilsen, Czech Republic
2 Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Czech Republic

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the associations of cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve measured by ultrasonography, the median to ulnar nerve ratio (MUR), the median to ulnar nerve difference (MUD) and the ratio of CSA of the median nerve to height squared (MHS) in relation to electrodiagnostic classification of moderate and severe carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and thus to identify patients suitable for surgical treatment.

Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted in patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent both median and ulnar nerve ultrasonography and electrodiagnostic studies (EDS). 124 wrists of 62 patients were examined. The patients' characteristics were acquired through a questionnaire. CTS was diagnosed using EDS and classified according to the guidelines of the Czech Republic Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. The CSA of the median nerve and of the ulnar nerve were measured at the carpal tunnel inlet.

Results: Median nerve CSA at the tunnel inlet ≥ 12 mm2 correlates with electrodiagnostic classification of moderate to severe carpal tunnel syndrome. At this cut-off value, the sensitivity of ultrasonography is 82.4%, its specificity is 87.7%, the positive predictive value is 82.4%, the negative predictive value is 87.7%. MUD, MUR and MHS perform worse than the median nerve CSA, as shown by their lower area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Conclusions: Ultrasound could help us indicate surgical treatment for CTS, especially in patients with clinical findings. Our results suggest a cut-off value of CSA at the tunnel inlet of ≥ 12mm2.

Keywords: carpal tunnel syndrome, median nerve, electrodiagnostic studies, ultrasonography, coss-sectional area

Received: September 17, 2021; Revised: November 19, 2021; Accepted: November 19, 2021; Prepublished online: December 9, 2021; Published: June 12, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Potuznik, P., Hosek, P., & Kotas, R. (2023). Median nerve ultrasonography examination correlates with electrodiagnostic studies for the diagnosis of moderate to severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Biomedical papers167(2), 192-198. doi: 10.5507/bp.2021.068
Download citation

References

  1. Katz JN, Simmons BP. Clinical practice. Carpal tunnel syndrome. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1807-12. Go to original source...
  2. Atroshi I, Englund M, Turkiewicz A, Tagil M, Petersson I. Incidence of physician-diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome in the general population. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:943-4. Go to original source...
  3. Gelfman R, Melton LJ 3rd, Yawn BP, Wollan PC, Amadio PC, Stevens JC. Long-term trends in carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology 2009;72:33-41. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosén I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999;282:153-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. de Krom MC, Kester AD, Knipschild PG, Spaans F. Risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Epidemiol 1990;132:1102-10. Go to original source...
  6. Glberman R, Hergenroeder P, Hargens A, Lundborg G, Akeson W. The carpal tunnel syndrome: a study of canal pressures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:380-3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Lundborg G. Nerve Injury and Repair. Edinburgh, New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1988.
  8. Kanta M, Ehler E, Kremláček J, Laštovička D, Adamkov J, Řehák S, Habalová J, Bartoš M. Efekt endoskopické a klasické operace pro syndrom karpálního tunelu. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2008;71/104(2):173-9.
  9. Fisse AL, Katsanos AH, Gold R, Pitarokoili K, Krogias C. Cross-sectional area reference values for peripheral nerve ultrasound in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis-Part I: Upper extremity nerves. Eur J Neurol 2021;28(5):1684-91. Go to original source...
  10. McDonagh C, Alexander M, Kane D. The Role of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A New Paradigm. Rheumatology 2015;54:9-19. Go to original source...
  11. Kadaňka Z, Dufek J, Hromada J. Standard elektrofyziologického vyšetření syndromu karpálního tunelu pro potřeby hlášení choroby z povolání. Česká neurologická společnost 2017 [cited 2021 Sep 15]. Available from: https://www.czech-neuro.cz/en/pro-odborniky/recommended-practices/doporuceni-pro-prakticke-lekare/carpal-tunnel-syndrome/ (In Czech)
  12. Agresti A, Coull BA. Approximate is Better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions, The American Statistician 1998;52:119-26. Go to original source...
  13. Iannicelli E, Almberger M, Chianta GA, Salvini V, Rossi G, Monacelli G, David V. High resolution ultrasonography in the diagnosis of the carpal tunnel syndrome. Radiol Med 2005;110:623-9. Go to PubMed...
  14. Fowler JR, Gaughan JP, Ilyas AM. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for diagnosis od carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:1089-94. Go to original source...
  15. Chen J, Chen L, Wu L, Wang R, Liu JB, Hu B, Jiang LX. Value of superb mikcovaskular imaging ultrasonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: Compared with color Doppler and power Doppler. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96(21): e6862. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Buchberger W, Judmaier W, Birbamer G, Lener M, Schmidauer C. Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis with high-resolution sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159(4):793-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Azami A, Maleki N, Anari H, Iranparvar Alamdari M, Kalantarhormozi M, Tavosi Z. The diagnostic value of ultrasound compared with nerve conduction velocity in carpal tunnel syndrome. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 2014;17:612-20. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Swen WA, Jacobs JW, Bussemaker FE, de Ward JW, Bijlsma JW. Carpal tunnel sonography by the rheumatologist versus nerve conduction study by the neurologist. J Rheumatol 2001;28:62-9. Go to PubMed...
  19. Wong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, Lo SK, Fu M, Wong KS. Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic usefulness of sonography. Radiology 2004;232:93-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Ha DS, Kim HS, Kim JM, Lee KH. The Correlation Between Electrodiagnostic Results and Ultrasonographic Findings in the Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Females. Ann Rehabil Med 2017;41(4):595-603. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Fowler JR, Munsch M, Tosti R, Hagberg WC, Imbriglia JE. Comparison of ultrasound and electrodiagnostic testing for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: study using a validated clinical tool as the reference standard. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96(17):e148. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Ooi CC, Wong SK, Tan AB, Chin AY, Abu Bakar R, Goh SY, Mohan PC, Yap RT, Png MA. Diagnostic criteria of carpal tunnel syndrome using high-resolution ultrasonography: correlation with nerve conduction studies. Skeletal Radiol 2014;43(10):1387-94. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Aggarwal P, Jirankali V, Garg SK. Accuracy of high-resolution ultrasonography in establishing the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. ANZ Journal of Surgery 2020;90:1057-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Sarraf P, Malek M, Ghajarzadeh M, Miri S, Parhizgar E, Emami-Razavi SZ. The best cutoff point for median nerve cross sectional area at the level of carpal tunnel inlet. Acta Med Iran 2014;52(8):613-8.
  25. Roomizadeh P, Eftekharsadat B, Abedini A, Ranjbar-Kiyakalayeh S, Yousefi N, Ebadi S, Babaei-Ghazani A. Ultrasonographic Assessment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Severity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2019;98(5):373-81. Go to original source...
  26. Moghtaderi A, Sanei-Sistani S, Sadoughi N, Hamed-Azimi H. Ultrasound evaluation of patients with moderate and severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Prague Med Rep 2012;113:23-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. El Miedany YM, Aty SA, Ashour S. Ultrasonography versus nerve conduction study in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: substantive or complementary tests? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004;43:887-95. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Chang YW, Hsieh TC, Tzeng IS, Chiu V, Huang PJ, Horng YS. Ratio and difference of the cross-sectional area of median nerve to ulnar nerve in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome: a case control study. BMC Med Imaging 2019;19:52. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Eom YI, Choi MH, Kim YK, Joo IS. Sonographic findings in the ulnar nerve according to the electrophysiologic stage of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2015;34(6):1027-34. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Yemisci OU, Yalbuzdag SA, Cosar SNS, Oztop P, Karatas M. Ulnar nerve conduction abnormalities in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2011;44:352-7. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.