Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2022, 166(2):222-227 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2021.010
The incidence and results of laser enhancement after cataract and refractive surgery with trifocal lens implantation
- a Gemini Eye Clinic, Prague, Czech Republic
- b Department of Ophthalmology, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- c Department of Circuit theory/Faculty of Electrical engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic
Purpose. To evaluate the incidence of laser enhancement following cataract surgery and refractive lens exchange (RLE) with FineVision Micro F trifocal lens implantation (PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium).
Methods: Retrospective study of patients who had undergone cataract or RLE surgery and had received a FineVision Micro F intraocular lens. Laser enhancement of residual refractive error was determined. Visual acuity (VA) assessments were performed before and after surgery: uncorrected distance VA (UCDVA), best-corrected distance VA (BCDVA), uncorrected near VA (UCNVA), plus preoperative and postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) assessments.
Results: Of the 1129 eyes from 596 patients, 61 (5.4%) required laser enhancement to correct residual refractive error (by group: 30/679 eyes [4.4%] cataract; 31/450 eyes [6.9%] RLE). Eleven eyes received FemtoLASIK; 50 eyes received PRK. Mean UCDVA before laser enhancement was 0.26±0.19 logMAR and 0.24±0.14 in the FemtoLASIK and PRK groups, respectively. After laser enhancement, these were 0.04±0.05 logMAR and 0.13±0.19, respectively; BCDVA values were 0.00±0.00 logMAR in the FemtoLASIK group and 0.06±0.11 in the PRK group. Laser enhancement improved UCNVA (Jaeger) from 2-3 to 1-2 in both groups. Enhancement reduced preoperative SE of -0.39±0.99 D and -0.53±0.58 D (FemtoLASIK and PRK groups, respectively) to 0.24±0.36 D and 0.04±0.47 D.
Conclusions: The FineVision Micro F trifocal lens is an effective solution for gaining increased spectacle independence. The incidence of residual refractive error requiring laser enhancement is low, and laser procedures are a safe and effective solution for improving the quality of vision and patient satisfaction. Synopsis. Laser enhancement rates and outcomes were determined following cataract / refractive lens exchange surgery that used a trifocal IOL. Enhancement was safe and effective and rates were low (5.4%).
Keywords: trifocal IOL, laser enhancement, cataract surgery, refractive lens exchange
Received: October 28, 2020; Revised: January 15, 2021; Accepted: January 20, 2021; Prepublished online: February 4, 2021; Published: May 13, 2022 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Schallhorn SC, Venter JA, Teenan D, Schallhorn JM, Hettinger KA, Hannan SJ, Pelouskova M. Outcomes of excimer laser enhancements in pseudophakic patients with multifocal intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:765-76.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Narvaez J, Zimmerman G, Stulting RD, Chang DH. Accuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:2050-53.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:125-29.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34:368-76.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Fernandez-Buenaga R, Alio JL, Perez Ardoy AL, Quesada AL, Pinilla-Cortes L, Barraquer RI. Resolving refractive error after cataract surgery: IOL exchange, piggyback lens, or LASIK. J Refract Surg 2013;29:676-83.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kuo IC, O'Brien TP, Broman AT, Ghajarnia M, Jabbur NS. Excimer laser surgery for correction of ametropia after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:21042110.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kohnen T. Multifocal IOL technology: a successful step on the journey toward presbyopia treatment. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:2005.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Woodward MA, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:992-97.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Gundersen KG, Makari S, Ostenstad S, Potvin R. Retreatments after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: an analysis. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:365-71.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Muftuoglu O, Prasher P, Chu C, Mootha VV, Verity SM, Cavanagh HD, Bowman RW, McCulley JP. Laser in situ keratomileusis for residual refractive errors after apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:1063-71.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Artola A, Ayala MJ, Claramonte P, Perez-Santonja JJ, Alio JL. Photorefractive keratectomy for residual myopia after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:1456-60.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Fan YY, Sun CC, Chen HC, Ma DH. Photorefractive keratectomy for correcting residual refractive error following cataract surgery with premium intraocular lens implantation. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 2018;8:149-58.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Moshirfar M, McCaughey MV, Santiago-Caban L. Corrective Techniques and Future Directions for Treatment of Residual Refractive Error Following Cataract Surgery. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 2014;9:529-37.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Roszkowska AM, Urso M, Signorino GA, Spadea L, Aragona P. Photorefractive keratectomy after cataract surgery in uncommon cases: long-term results. Int J Ophthalmol 2018;11:612-15.
- Gibbons A, Ali TK, Waren DP, Donaldson KE. Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:1965-70.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- el-Agha MS, Johnston EW, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, McCulley JP. Excimer laser treatment of spherical hyperopia: PRK or LASIK? Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2000;98:59-66; discussion 66-59.
Go to PubMed...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.