Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2019, 163(2):147-154 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2019.008

The influence of mode of anaesthesia for caesarean delivery on neonatal Apgar scores in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: secondary analysis of the results of an international survey in 2015

Hana Harazima, Petr Stouracb, Jan Blahac, Monika Grochovad, Radka Klozovae, Pavlina Noskovac, Dagmar Seidlovaf, Stanislava Richterovag, Michal Svobodah, Jiri Jarkovskyh, Xenia Silovai, Bozena Jezovaj, Jiri Steinbachk, Martin Zemanekl, Jitka Mannovam, Jan Slavikn, Zuzana Novakovao, Lubica Misakovap, Jozef Firmentd
a Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
b Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
c Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, 1 st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
d Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, L. Pasteur University Hospital, Kosice, Slovakia
e Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, 2 nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
f 2 nd Department of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
g Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Martin, Martin, Slovakia
h Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
i Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Charles University and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
j Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Opava Hospital, Opava, Czech Republic
k Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Horovice Hospital, Horovice, Czech Republic
l Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Chrudim Hospital, Chrudim, Czech Republic
m Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Havlickuv Brod Hospital, Havlickuv Brod, Czech Republic
n Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kosice-Saca Hospital, Kosice, Slovakia
o Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Piestany Hospital, Piestany, Slovakia
p Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Trencin Hospital, Trencin, Slovakia

Aims: The purpose of this international survey was to describe the impact of current practices and techniques of caesarean section on the neonatal Apgar score in the Czech Republic (CZE) and Slovakia (SVK).

Methods: All Czech and Slovak departments that provide obstetric anaesthesia were invited to participate in a one-month (November 2015) prospective study that monitored in details all peripartum anaesthetic practices, delivered by anaesthesiologists. Participating centers recorded all data on-line in the CLADE-IS database (Masaryk University, CZE). Results and Discussions. We collected data of 10119 women who delivered 10226 newborns. A caesarean section was recorded in 25.1% of deliveries (CZE 23.2%; SVK 30%). General anaesthesia was used for caesarean section in 37.5% of the cases (CZE 40%, SVK 33%). There was no statistically significant difference in the Apgar score lower than 7 in the 1, 5 or 10 min in groups of general and regional anaesthesia for caesarean section, when only elective sections of in-term babies with birth weight over 2500 g were analyzed. We found no statistically significant differences in the Apgar score in newborns of women intubated for caesarean section in rocuronium (n=21; 2.2%) and suxamethonium (n=889; 93%).

Conclusion: We found no difference in neonatal outcomes in groups of general and regional anaesthesia for caesarean section when only out-of-risk newborns were analyzed. The risk factors were identified as follows: an acute caesarean section, preterm babies, birth weight less than 2 500 g, born in perinatological center and multiple pregnancy - second baby. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02380586) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02380586

Keywords: caesarean section, Apgar score, rocuronium, suxamethonium, international survey, general anaesthesia, rapid sequence induction, neonatal outcome

Received: February 18, 2019; Accepted: March 4, 2019; Prepublished online: April 9, 2019; Published: June 25, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Harazim, H., Stourac, P., Blaha, J., Grochova, M., Klozova, R., Noskova, P., ... Firment, J. (2019). The influence of mode of anaesthesia for caesarean delivery on neonatal Apgar scores in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: secondary analysis of the results of an international survey in 2015. Biomedical papers163(2), 147-154. doi: 10.5507/bp.2019.008
Download citation

References

  1. Rucklidge M. Paralysis analysis - does choice of muscle relaxant for obstetric general anaesthesia influence neonatal outcomes? Int J Obstet Anesth 2017;32:1-3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Lucas DN, Yentis SM. Unsettled weather and the end for thiopental? Obstetric general anaesthesia after the NAP5 and MBRRACE-UK reports. Anaesthesia 2015;70(4):375-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Devroe S, Van de Velde M, Rex S. General anesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2015;28(3):240-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Mushambi MC, Kinsella SM, Popat M, Swales H, Ramaswamy KK, Winton AL, Quinn AC, Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association, Difficult Airway Society. Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 2015;70(11):1286-1306. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Desai N, Wicker J, Sajayan A, Mendonca C. A survey of practice of rapid sequence induction for caesarean section in England. Int J Obstet Anesth 2018;36:3-10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Kosinova M, Stourac P, Adamus M, Seidlova D, Pavlik T, Janku P, Krikava I, Mrozek Z, Prochazka M, Klucka J, Stoudek R, Bartikova I, Harazim H, Robotkova H, Hejduk K, Hodicka Z, Kirchnerova M, Francakova J, Pyszkova LO, Hlozkova J, Sevcik P. Rocuronium versus suxamethonium for rapid sequence induction of general anaesthesia for caesarean section: influence on neonatal outcomes. Int J Obstet Anesth 2017;32:4-10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Stourac P, Blaha J, Noskova P, Klozová R, Seidlová D, Jarkovský J, Zelinková H, Skupina OC. Analgesia for labour in the Czech Republic in the year 2011 from the perspective of OBAAMA-CZ study - prospective national survey. Ceska Gynekol 2015;80(2):127-34. (In Czech)
  8. Stourac P, Blaha J, Klozova R, Noskova P, Seidlova D, Brozova L, Jarkovsky J. Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in the Czech Republic: A 2011 National Survey. Anesth Analg 2015;120(6):1303-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Bláha J, ©tourač P, Grochová M, Klozová R, Richterová S, Nosková P, Seidlová D, Zenkner V, Novotný A, Schwarz D, ©čamburová J, Kosinová M, Kufa C, Kirchnerová M, Macková J, Vároąová L, Toboláková R, Cepák J, Firment J; OBAAMA-INT Study Group. Labor analgesia in Czech Republic and Slovakia: a 2015 national survey. Int J Obstet Anesth 2018;35:42-51. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Stourac P, Blaha J, Grochova M, Firment J, Noskova P, Schwarz D. Preferred techniques for obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia in Czech and Slovak Republic in the year 2015 - prospective observational survey. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2016;33:182-2.
  11. Sabol BA, Caughey AB. Acidemia in neonates with a 5-minute Apgar score of 7 or greater - What are the outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215(4):6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Committee Opinion No. 644: The Apgar Score. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126(4):52-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Bashambu MT, Whitehead H, Hibbs AM, Martin RJ, Bhola M. Evaluation of Interobserver Agreement of Apgar Scoring in Preterm Infants. Pediatrics 2012;130(4):982-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Thavarajah H, Flatley C, Kumar S. The relationship between the five minute Apgar score, mode of birth and neonatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018;31(10):1335-41. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Abboud TK, Nagappala S, Murakawa K, David S, Haroutunian S, Zakarian M, Yanagi T, Sheikh-Ol-Eslam A. Comparison of the effects of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section on neonatal neurologic and adaptive capacity scores. Anesth Analg 1985;64(10):996-1000. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Ong BY, Cohen MM, Palahniuk RJ. Anesthesia for Cesarean Section - Effects on Neonates. Anesth Analg 1989;68(3):270-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Fox GS, Smith JB, Namba Y, Johnson RC. Anesthesia for Cesarean Section - further studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;133(1):15-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Zagorzycki MT, Brinkman CR. The effect of general and epidural anesthesia upon neonatal Apgar scores in repeat cesarean section. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;155(5):641-5. Go to original source...
  19. Korkmaz F, Eksioglu B, Hanci A, Basgul A. Comparison of combined spinal epidural block and general anesthesia for cesarean section. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004;29(77). Go to original source...
  20. Dyer RA, Els I, Farbas J, Torr GJ, Schoeman LK, James MF. Prospective, randomized trial comparing general with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in preeclamptic patients with a nonreassuring fetal heart trace. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(3):561-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Palmer E, Ciechanowicz S, Reeve A, Harris S, Wong DJN, Sultan P. Operating room-to-incision interval and neonatal outcome in emergency caesarean section: a retrospective 5-year cohort study. Anaesthesia 2018;73(7):825-31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Afolabi BB, Lesi FEA. Regional versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012(10):89. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Carlos R, Nani F, Donald de Boer H. Re: Influence on neonatal outcomes of rocuronium for rapid sequence induction of general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2017;67(5):552-3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Meretoja O, Kokki H. Neuromuscular blocking agents in children. In: Bissonnette B, editors. Pediatric Anesthesia: Basic Principles - State of the Art - Future. Shelton, Connecticut, USA: People´s Medical Publishing House; 2011. p. 416-440.
  25. Goudsouzian NG, Standaert FG. The Infant and the Myoneural Junction. Anesth Analg 1986;65(11):1208-17. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Wierda J, Meretoja OA, Taivainen T, Proost JH. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic-dynamic modelling of rocuronium in infants and children. Br J Anaesth 1997;78(6):690-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Abouleish E, Abboud T, Lechevalier T, Zhu J, Chalian A, Alford K. Rocuronium (ORG-9426) for Cesarean Section. Br J Anaesth 1994;73(3):336-41. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Guay J, Grenier Y, Varin F. Clinical pharmacokinetics of neuromuscular relaxants in pregnancy. Clin Pharmacokinet 1998;34(6):483-96. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.