Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2014, 158(2):201-207 | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2012.057

Study of photodynamic effects on NIH 3T3 cell line and bacteria

Adela Hanakovaa, Katerina Bogdanovab, Katerina Tomankovaa, Svatopluk Bindera, Robert Bajgara, Katerina Langovaa, Milan Kolarb, Jiri Mosingerc, Hana Kolarovaa
a Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry and Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic
b Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry and Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Palacky University Olomouc
c Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Prague

Background. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a constantly growing challenge. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) offers a new approach to the treatment of bacterial and viral diseases. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of photosensitizers used in PDT applied to cell lines and bacterial strains.

Methods: We tested the cytotoxicity and phototoxicity of 3 photosensitizers: TPPS4, ZnTPPS4 and TMPyP applied to the NIH3T3 cell line using two established methods for measuring ROS production and, MTT viability assay. Bacterial viability was determined spectrophotometrically over 24 h following PDT.

Results: The most efficient photosensitiser was TMPyP as it reduced the viability of the NIH3T3 cell line by more than 85%. In general, the photosensitisers were more phototoxic to the two Gram-positive bacterial strains, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. The viability of E. faecalis was reduced to 78 % by a dose radiation 0.5 J/cm2 and concentration of TMPyP 1.562 µmol/L. The viability of bacterium S. aureus was reduced to 23 % when exposed to a radiation dose 0.5 J/cm2 and 100 µmol/L concentration of ZnTPPS4. The highest viability decrease (15 %) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa was caused by 0.5 J/cm2 radiation dose and 50 µmol/L TMPyP concentration. Escherichia coli proved to be PDT resistant as the bacterial viability was higher than 90%.

Conclusions: The goal of the present study was to test the efficiency of photosensitizers on the NIH 3T3 cell line and bacterial cells. Subsequently we would like to study effectiveness of photosensitizers bound to carriers (for example cyclodextrins) on other cell line and bacterial strain.

Keywords: phototoxicity, porphyrin, Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, antibacterial therapy

Received: December 13, 2011; Accepted: May 18, 2012; Prepublished online: June 15, 2012; Published: June 23, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hanakova, A., Bogdanova, K., Tomankova, K., Binder, S., Bajgar, R., Langova, K., ... Kolarova, H. (2014). Study of photodynamic effects on NIH 3T3 cell line and bacteria. Biomedical papers158(2), 201-207. doi: 10.5507/bp.2012.057
Download citation

References

  1. Merchat M, Bertoloni G, Giacomini P, Villanueva A, Jori G, Meso-substituted cationic porphyrins as efficient photosensitizers of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. J Photochem Photobiol B 1996;32:153-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Minnock A, Vernon DI, Schofield J, Griffiths J, Parish JH, Brown SB, Mechanism of uptake of a cationic water-soluble pyridium zinc phthalocyanine across the outer membrane of Escherichia Coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 2000a;44:522-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Nitzan Y, Gutterman M, Malik Z, Ehrenberg B. Inactivation of gram - negative bacteria by photosensitized porphyrins. Photochem Photobiol 1992;55:89-97. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Maish T, Bosl C, Szeimies RM, Lehn N, Abels C. Photodynamic effects of novel XF porphyrin derivates on prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:1542-52. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Merchat M, Spikes JD, Bertoloni G, Jori G. Studies on the mechanism of bacteria photosensitization by meso-substitued cationic porphyrins. J Photochem Photobiol B 1996;35:149-57. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Minnock A, Vernon DI, Schofield J, Griffiths J, Parish JH, Brown ST. Photoinactivation of bacteria. Use of a cationic water-soluble zine phtalocyanine to photoinactivate both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 2000b;32:159-64. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Segalla A, Borsarelli CD, Braslavski SE, Spikes JD, Roncucci G, Dei D, Chiti G, Jori G, Reddi E. Photophysical, photochemical and antibacterial photosensitizing properties of a novel octacationic Zn(II)- phthalocyanine. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2002;1:641-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Raab O. Leber die Wirkung fluorizierender Stoffe auf Influsorien. Z Biol 1990;39:524-46.
  9. Chowdhary RK, Ratkay LG, Canaan AJ, Waterfield JD, Richter AM, Levy JG. Uptake of Verteporfin® by Articular Tissues Following Systemic and Intra-Articular Administration. Biopharm. Drug Dispos 1998;19:395-400. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Lipson R, Baldes E, Olsen A. The use of a derivative of hematoporphyrin in tumor detection. JNCI 1961;26:1. Go to PubMed...
  11. Manyak MJ. Photodynamic therapy: present concepts and future applications. The Cancer Journal 1990;32:104-9.
  12. Wainwright M. Photodynamic antimicrobial therapy (PACT). J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;42:13-28. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Nitzan Y, Shainberg B, Malik Z. The mechanism of photodynamic inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus by deuteroporphyrin. Curr Microbiol 1989;19:265-9. Go to original source...
  14. Kolarova H, Nevrelova P, Tomankova K, Kolar P, Bajgar R and Mosinger J. Production of reactive oxygen species after photodynamic therapy by porphyrin sensitizers. Gen Physiol Biophys 2008;27:101-5 Go to PubMed...
  15. Kolarova H, Bajgar R, Tomankova K, Nevrelova P and Mosinger J. Comparison of sensitizers by detecting reactive oxygen species after photodynamic reaction in vitro. Toxicology in vitro 2007;21:1287-91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Kolarova H, Mosinger J, Lenobel R, Kejlova K, Jirova D, Strnad M. In vitro toxicity testing of supramolecular sensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Toxicology In Vitro 2003;17:775-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Jori G, Fabris C, Soncin M, Ferro S, Coppellotti O, Dei D, Fantetti L, Chiti G, Roncucci G. Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Microbial Infections: Basic Principles and Perspective Applications. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 2006;38:468-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...