Biomed. Papers 148(2), 171-173 (2004) | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2004.031

Use of EQUORAL® in de novo renal transplant recipients

Josef Zadražila, Sadek Al Jabrya, Petr Bachledab, Agáta Gibejovác
a 3rd Clinic of Internal Medicine, Teaching Hospital, Olomouc,Czech Republic
b 1st Clinic of Surgery, Teaching Hospital, Olomouc,Czech Republic
c Clinical Department, Research and development Division, IVAX Pharmaceuticals s.r.o., Ostravská 29, 747 70 Opava,Czech Republic

This paper presents our experience to date with using a cyclosporine formulation Equoral® (IVAX Pharmaceuticals) together with mycophenolate mofetil plus a steroid immunosuppressive regimen in the treatment of de novo renal transplant recipients. Ten cadaveric donor renal transplant recipients of mean age 51.6 years (range 37-66) were followed up over 6 months for the development of rejection attacks and side effects. All patients received prednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil (1 g/day during the first 5 days posttransplant and then 20 mg/kg/day) plus cyclosporine (3 mg/kg/day). Biopsy proven acute rejection episodes were observed in 2 out of 10 patients (20 %). Six months patient as well as renal graft survival rate was 100 %. The development of graft function was immediate after transplantation. The mean serum creatinine levels were gradually decreased. Over the 6-month posttransplant period, the function of the graft was satisfactory and stable. The majority of observed adverse events were those commonly reported with the use of cyclosporine and they resolved with a reduction in cyclosporine dose. Equoral® treatment demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with maintenance of adequate renal function without incidence of malignancy/lymphoproliferative disease or serious infections. In conclusion, Equoral® plus mycophenolate mofetil immunosuppression seems effective and safe on terms acute rejection rates, patient and renal graft survival rates and side profiles.

Keywords: Cyclosporine A, Renal transplantation de novo, Equoral®

Received: August 15, 2004; Accepted: September 5, 2004; Published: December 1, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zadražil, J., Al Jabry, S., Bachleda, P., & Gibejová, A. (2004). Use of EQUORAL® in de novo renal transplant recipients. Biomedical papers148(2), 171-173. doi: 10.5507/bp.2004.031
Download citation

References

  1. Matsuda S, Koyasu S. (2000) Mechanisms of action of cyclosporine. Immunopharmacology 47, 119-125. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Kovarik JM, Mueller EA, van Bree JB, Fluckiger SS, Lange H, Schmidt B, Boesken WH, Lison AE, Kutz K. (1994). Cyclosporine pharmacokinetics and variability from a microemulsion formulation-- a multicenter investigation in kidney transplant patients. Transplantation 58, 658-663. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Kovarik JM, Mueller EA, van Bree JB, Tetzloff W, Kutz K. (1994). Reduced inter- and intraindividual variability in cyclosporine pharmacokinetics from a microemulsion formulation. J Pharm Sci 83, 444-446. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Dunn CJ, Wagstaff AJ, Perry CM, Plosker GL, Goa KL. (2001). Cyclosporin: an updated review of the pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability of a microemulsion-based formulation (Neoral)1 in organ transplantation. Drugs 61, 1957-2016. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Masri MA, Haberal M, Rizvi A, Stephan A, Bilgin N, Naqvi A, Barbari A, Kamel G, Zafar N, Emiroglu R, Colak T, Manzoor K, Matha V, Kamarád V, Rizk S, Itany AR, Shehedeh I. (2004). The pharmacokinetics of Equoral versus Neoral in stable renal transplant patients: a multinational multicenter study. Transplant Proc 36, 80-83. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Andrýsek T, Masri M, Jegorov A, Veselský Z, Matha V. (2003). Equoral, new cyclosporine drug delivery system, versus Neoral: a bioequivalence study in healthy volunteers. Transplant Proc 35, 207-209. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Masri MA, Andrýsek T, Matha V. (2003). The role of generics in transplantation. Transplant Proc 35, 2745-2747. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...