Biomed. Papers 148(1), 75-79 (2004) | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2004.013

OUR EXPERIENCES WITH THE TREATMENT OF PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES OF FEMUR

Leopold Pleva, Milan Šír, Roman Madeja
Centre of Traumatology University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic

In the statement authors want to draw attention to the possibilities of treatment of periprosthetic fractures of femur. They present their own experiences with the treatment of these fractures by using various types of internal and external fixation evaluated from 1996 to 2003. They present some less common types of internal fixation as e.g. fixation by clamp plates.

Keywords: Periprosthetic fracture, Internal and external fi xation, Clamp plates

Received: March 25, 2004; Accepted: May 18, 2004; Published: July 1, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pleva, L., Šír, M., & Madeja, R. (2004). OUR EXPERIENCES WITH THE TREATMENT OF PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES OF FEMUR. Biomedical papers148(1), 75-79. doi: 10.5507/bp.2004.013
Download citation

References

  1. Culpulp RW, Schmidt RG, Hanks G et al. (1987) Supracondylar fracture of the femur following prosthetic knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 222, 212-222. Go to original source...
  2. Figgie MP, Golberg VM, Figgie HE et al. (1990) The results of treatment of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 5, 267-276. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Johansson JE, McBroom R, Barrington TW et al. (1981) Fracture of the ipsilateral femur in patients with total hip replacement. Am J Surg 63, 1435-1442. Go to original source...
  4. Pleva L. Zevní fi xace v traumatologii. Ostrava: Cicero, 1992. 173 s.
  5. Shaw JA, Greer RB III. Orthopaedic Surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott, 1994. 1056 s.