Biomedical papers - Ahead of Print

Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. X:X | 10.5507/bp.2018.010

Comparison of ultrasound with hysteroscopic and histological findings for intrauterine assessment

Lukas Reznaka, Milan Kudelab,c
a Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Vítkovicka Nemocnice Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic
b Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
c FHT, Tomas Bata University, Zlin, Czech Republic

Introduction: Hysteroscopy with biopsy is a common diagnostic and therapeutic method in gynaecology. Its use is preceded by ultrasound examination. The success rate of predicting intrauterine findings based on ultrasound has not been assessed in the Czech Republic for a long time. In the meantime, there have been technological improvements in ultrasound devices.

Method: Patients indicated for hysteroscopy underwent ultrasound examination and their medical history was recorded. The percentage agreement between ultrasound and histopathological findings was assessed. The secondary goal was to find an easier way of describing ultrasound findings in gynaecological practice.

Results: The study comprised 255 patients. In 15 cases, endometrial carcinoma was confirmed by hysteroscopy and histopathological examination. Of these, malignancies were suspected based on previous ultrasound scans in 11 patients. In 95 cases, intrauterine polyps were detected. The success rate for predicting polyps by ultrasound examination was 65.1%. The agreement between ultrasound and hysteroscopic/histopathological findings was 72%. The secondary goal of making the description of the uterine cavity easier was not fulfilled. The prediction percentages for the criteria were low. The incidence of pathological findings in ultrasound findings labelled as anechogenic was 4.8%, suggesting a high negative predictive value.

Conclusion: In spite of the better resolution of new ultrasound devices, their predictive value remains limited. Findings that are suspicious in ultrasound should be confirmed by hysteroscopy with biopsy.

Keywords: hysteroscopy, ultrasound, histology, comparison

Received: August 20, 2017; Accepted: March 19, 2018; Prepublished online: March 27, 2018


References

  1. Národní zdravotnický infomační sytém - národní onkologický registr. Nová data onkologického registru ČR za rok 2014, NZIS report č. R/1 (09/2016) (In Czech)
  2. Kužel D, Toth D, Mára M. Základy panoramatické hysteroskopie. Grada Publishing 2016 (In Czech)
  3. Ben-Arie A, Goldchmit C, Laviv Y, Levy R, Caspi B, Huszar M, Dqani R, Haqay Z. The malignant potential of endometrial polyps. EUR J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 115: 206-210 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Cohen I. Endometrial pathologies associated with postmenopausal tamoxifen treatment. Gynecol Oncol 2004;94:256-66 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Lieng M, Qvigstad E, Sandvik L, Jorgensen H, Langerbrekke A, Istre O. Hysteroscopic resection of symptomatic and asymptomatic endometrial polyps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14: 189-194 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Kudela M., Pilka R., Hejtmánek P., Dzvinčuk P., Ondrová D. Význam sonografie a hysteroskopie u suspektních nálezů na endometriu menopauzálních žen. Čes Gynek 2008;73(2):104-8. (In Czech)
  7. Yasa C, Dural O, Bastu E, Ugurlucan FG, Nehir A, İyibozkurt AC. Evaluation of the diagnostic role of transvaginal ultrasound measurements of endometrialthickness to detect endometrial malignancy in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;294(2):311-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Kanthi JM, Remadevi C, Sumathy S, Sharma D, Sreedhar S, Jose A. Clinical Study of Endometrial Polyp and Role of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy and Blind Avulsion of Polyp. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10(6):QC01-4.
  9. Hassa H, Telkin B, Senses T, Kaya M, Karatas A. Are the site, diameter and number of endometrial polyps related with symptomatology? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:718-21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Wanderley MD, Álvares MM, Vogt MF, Sazaki LM. Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasonography, Hysteroscopy and Uterine Curettage in Evaluating Endometrial Pathologies. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2016;38(10):506-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Alcázar JL, Castillo G, Mínguez JA, Galán MJ. Endometrial blood flow mapping using transvaginal power Doppler sonography in women with postmenopausal bleeding and thickened endometrium. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21(6):583-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Shiva M, Ahmadi F, Arabipoor A, Oromiehchi M, Chehrazi M. Accuracy of Two-Dimensional Transvaginal Sonography and Office Hysteroscopy for Detection of Uterine Abnormalities in Patients with Repeated Implantation Failures or Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Int J Fertil Steril 2018;11(4):287-92. Go to PubMed...
  13. Lieng M, Istre O, Sandvik L, Qvigstad E. Prevalence, 1- year Regression Rate and Clinical Significance of Asymptomatic Endoetrial Polyps: Cross-sectional study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:465-71. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Ozer A, Ozer S, Kanat-Pektas M. Correlation between transvaginal ultrasound measured endometrial thickness and histopathological findings in Turkish women with abnormal uterine bleeding. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2016;42(5):573-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...