RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
A1 Moravec, Ondrej
A1 Skala, Tomas
A1 Klementova, Olga
A1 Skalova, Jitka
A1 Hutyra, Martin
A1 Precek, Jan
A1 Fedorco, Marian
A1 Cernicek, Vlastimil
A1 Tudos, Zbynek
A1 Zapletalova, Jana
A1 Taborsky, Milos
T1 General anesthesia or conscious sedation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
JF Biomedical papers
YR 2021
VO 165
IS 2
SP 162
OP 168
DO 10.5507/bp.2020.012
UL https://biomed.papers.upol.cz/artkey/bio-202102-0008.php
AB Background. Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) can be performed under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. The influence of type of anesthesiology care on procedural characteristics and ablation outcome in patients in whom intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and elimination of adenosine-mediated dormant conduction (DC) is used is not entirely known. Methods. 150 patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized to point-by-point radiofrequency catheter isolation of pulmonary veins (PVI) under general anesthesia (n=77) or conscious sedation (n=73). Adenosine-mediated dormant conduction was eliminated in all patients. Antiarrhythmic medication was discontinued after PVI. During twelve months of follow-up, all patients underwent four times 7-day ECG monitorings. Results. There was no difference between groups in AF recurrence (28.6% vs. 31.5%, P=0.695). Patients in conscious sedation had longer procedure times (160 ± 32.1 vs. 132 ± 31.5 min, P<0.001), longer RF energy application times (40 ± 15 vs. 29 ± 11 min, P<0.001) and longer fluoroscopy times (6.2 min ± 5.3 vs. 4.3 min ± 2.2, P<0.001) with similar complication rates. Conclusion. Conscious sedation is not inferior to general anesthesia in regard to arrhythmia recurrence or complication rates of catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. However, it is associated with longer procedure times, longer time of radiofrequency energy application and longer fluoroscopy times.